🔗 Share this article

These days present a very distinctive occurrence: the inaugural US procession of the babysitters. Their attributes range in their skills and traits, but they all share the common mission – to avert an Israeli breach, or even destruction, of the delicate truce. After the hostilities finished, there have been rare occasions without at least one of Donald Trump’s envoys on the ground. Only recently included the likes of Jared Kushner, a businessman, JD Vance and a political figure – all arriving to execute their roles.

The Israeli government engages them fully. In only a few short period it launched a set of strikes in Gaza after the killings of two Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers – resulting, as reported, in many of local fatalities. Multiple leaders called for a restart of the conflict, and the Knesset passed a preliminary resolution to incorporate the West Bank. The US stance was somewhere between “no” and “hell no.”

However in more than one sense, the Trump administration seems more focused on maintaining the existing, tense stage of the truce than on progressing to the next: the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip. Concerning that, it looks the United States may have aspirations but few concrete proposals.

Currently, it remains uncertain at what point the proposed global administrative entity will actually assume control, and the same applies to the designated military contingent – or even the identity of its personnel. On a recent day, Vance said the United States would not impose the composition of the foreign contingent on Israel. But if the prime minister's government continues to refuse various proposals – as it did with the Ankara's offer lately – what happens then? There is also the reverse point: who will establish whether the troops supported by Israel are even interested in the task?

The issue of how long it will need to disarm Hamas is equally vague. “Our hope in the leadership is that the global peacekeeping unit is going to at this point take the lead in demilitarizing the organization,” said the official this week. “That’s going to take a period.” The former president further highlighted the lack of clarity, declaring in an conversation a few days ago that there is no “rigid” schedule for Hamas to lay down arms. So, hypothetically, the unidentified members of this not yet established global force could enter Gaza while Hamas militants still wield influence. Would they be facing a governing body or a insurgent group? These are just a few of the issues emerging. Others might wonder what the result will be for average Palestinians as things stand, with the group persisting to focus on its own political rivals and dissidents.

Latest events have afresh underscored the omissions of Israeli journalism on the two sides of the Gaza boundary. Every source attempts to scrutinize each potential angle of the group's infractions of the truce. And, usually, the fact that Hamas has been delaying the return of the bodies of slain Israeli captives has monopolized the headlines.

On the other hand, reporting of civilian fatalities in the region caused by Israeli operations has obtained minimal notice – if at all. Take the Israeli retaliatory strikes following Sunday’s Rafah incident, in which a pair of military personnel were lost. While Gaza’s authorities stated dozens of deaths, Israeli media analysts complained about the “limited answer,” which targeted solely infrastructure.

That is typical. During the recent few days, Gaza’s press agency accused Israel of infringing the ceasefire with the group multiple times after the ceasefire began, killing dozens of individuals and harming an additional 143. The claim was unimportant to most Israeli reporting – it was simply ignored. This applied to information that eleven members of a local household were fatally shot by Israeli forces recently.

The emergency services said the group had been seeking to return to their residence in the Zeitoun neighbourhood of Gaza City when the vehicle they were in was targeted for reportedly going over the “yellow line” that defines territories under Israeli military authority. This limit is invisible to the naked eye and appears solely on maps and in authoritative papers – often not obtainable to everyday people in the area.

Even this event barely received a reference in Israeli news outlets. One source mentioned it in passing on its online platform, citing an IDF representative who explained that after a suspicious car was spotted, soldiers shot warning shots towards it, “but the car continued to approach the soldiers in a fashion that created an immediate threat to them. The soldiers shot to remove the risk, in accordance with the truce.” No fatalities were reported.

Amid such perspective, it is no surprise numerous Israeli citizens believe Hamas solely is to responsible for violating the ceasefire. That belief risks prompting calls for a stronger stance in Gaza.

Eventually – possibly in the near future – it will not be adequate for US envoys to take on the role of caretakers, advising Israel what to refrain from. They will {have to|need